GUEST POST: N6JSX on “How to Kill a Ham” 12 - November - 2010Posted by k9zw in Amateur Radio, K9ZW, K9ZW Just Rambled.
Tags: Clubs, Guest Post, K9ZW, K9ZW Just Rambled, N6JSX
Guest Post by Dale N6JSX on observations of what kills a club & an a ham’s enthusiasm with advice on what seems to work to keep thing healthy:
How to Kill a HAM
I’ve seen HAMs come and go.
The cause of their silence is NOT due to becoming a “Silent Key” but that their HAM spirit was killed by other HAMs.
Occasionally, the reason for a HAM’s silence is discovered.
The common causes are:
- “I’m tired of listening to the b_ llsh _ t!”
- “I’ve been black-ball by the repeater’s ‘click’!”
- “I’m tired of hearing false innuendo’s about me or others!”
- “I did a project and then got trashed by the ‘click’!”
Additional causes of a broken spirit: burned out and frustrated Club officer, discriminated by manipulated elections, NO recognition of efforts given, being the subject of off-air character assassinations, asked to do a project to get NO officer support, not allowed to participate in technical projects when you’re one of the most knowledgeable, giving your time/effort to obtain requested training to never get activated, watching do-nothing suck-ups getting rewarded for none efforts!
When a HAM decides that Amateur Radio is NOT worth the personal aggravation they usual just turn off their radio and fade away into in-activity pursuing non-related HAM adventures.
The quickest way to get, totally, BURNED out on HAM radio is to become a REPEATER Club officer or a member volunteering to work Org/club projects.
Some HAM’s see becoming an Officer fulfills a personal ego ambition in giving them their first taste of perceived ‘power’ – often becoming tyrants and fracturing the Club.
However, most HAM’s become Club officer to make a “positive” difference and to improve the club.
But an officer with integrity, practices equality, and willing to run the Club as a democracy, will surely rock-the-boat making you a target for political character assassination by the inside “click.”
As an ethical officer, nothing you do will be good enough – NO matter how reasonable or how logical your actions – YOU DID NOT DO IT RIGHT per some member!
An ethical officer may survive a term in office but do NOT expect to receive the appropriate ‘thank you’ for your services.
However, if you are a gutless follower, that allows the “click” to control your actions, you can be an officer for years – receiving HIGH praise for your lethargic non-efforts!
Another way to reach burn-out is to become a volunteer for a National HAM organization, like ARRL, ARES, Red Cross, SkyWarn, HLS-EMA, RACES, etc.
Then you can be used, abused, and discarded, merely, for trying to improve their SYSTEM or (heaven forbid) you question the logic of their illogical methods.
Involvement in these organizations can give you great insight on how much false recognition goes to politically positioned “do-nothing suck-up HAMs.”
In time you may discover that you were merely used to further the organization’s financial goals or management’s salaried gains.
Remember, NO National organization stays in business without money!
If you want to make HAM radio a life long hobby then ONLY accept a HAM leadership position or project with your eyes wide open.
HAM radio has much to offer and many various modes of communication.
Take your time to learn, keep your ears open, and get your feet wet in HAMdom BEFORE you decide to get involved in Org/Club politics/projects!
Then ONLY get involved with guarded expectations.
Being an ethical officer requires you to put on a helmet, flack jacket, and toughen up your emotions.
NEVER expect the recognition you deserve.
Be prepared to see political insiders take credit for your work and berate your efforts.
Remember, for some HAMs it is easier to hurl negative slurs than to give “positive” complements!
To ALL ethical HAM’s and Club OFFICERS – GOOD LUCK!
All good thing to think about!
Why Rules Matter to a Club 20 - March - 2009Posted by k9zw in Amateur Radio, K9ZW, K9ZW Just Rambled.
Tags: Clubs, K9ZW, K9ZW Just Rambled
1 comment so far
I was asked in conversation why I thought Rules (like the Constitution and By-Laws) matter in a club, specially as contended by one Honorary Life Member that a Radio Club is only a social club, and further that majority votes are mandates. This was written for fellow board members and adapted for this post.
Why Rules Matter to a Club
First addressing the Social Club Only contention:
It is true that fraternity and social interaction is one of the prime reasons for any club, but it is seldom a unique & singular reason – the Social side of a club is one of many reasons to have an Amateur Radio Club.
Our Club has a history of a strong social function, one which by the way the most vocal complainers have largely withdrawn from.
But as important as Christmas Parties, Picnics, and Club Meetings are, they were wrapped around a number of other reasons to exist:
- Ownership of Resources general more expensive than a single member might be expected to provide (repeaters & club stations).
- Ensuring community wide availability of those shared resources (keeping the repeater “open” and having the club station available to members).
- Attracting & Educating community members interested in becoming involved in the hobby.
- Supporting the Community with Amateur Radio activities ranging from courtesy (demonstrations, assistance) to Emcomm (ride-alongs with Police, weather spotting to Formal Emcomm)
- Supporting Club Members interested in Specialized Activities part of Amateur Radio (DX, Contesting, Experimenting, Digital, Nets, Message Handling, Lighthouse/Island/Ship Activations…..)
- Providing a hobbyist existence greater than just the sum of the members and with continuity beyond the lives of the members.
- and many more.
The argument that the club is only a Social Club is inaccurate. Having a Social aspect is definitely part of a Radio Club, but is not in our case the only, or even the most important, reason Mancorad exists.
Why Rules Matter to a Club:
Our club uses the typical club structure that politically is called a “Representational” structure (or in the classic sense a “Republic”) where those elected from the Membership as a whole guide the club’s desired course of action taking account the expressed wishes of the group (whether by voting or other methods) within the framework of external laws and an internal previously agreed framework (Constitution, By-Laws and Past Votes.)
In other words the club functions by having representatives make sure that something the club wants to do is moral, legal and in keeping with the club’s own written documentation.
Some have been contending that the club is not “Representational” but rather is always controlled by the last majority vote. They claim this is “Democracy” not realizing that this is actually a form of “Mob Rule” unless tempered by inspection of the requested course of action for morality, legality and correctness in reference the club’s agreed written documents.
Deep down we all know this – if at a meeting if those present moved & supported a motion to sell all club assets and give them all the money in unmarked $ 20′s so they could go on a cruise, we know this would be morally wrong, legally (specially taxation) and would not “fly” when the club’s mission was examined, no matter if they had a majority vote.
It actually is exactly this feeling – this knowledge of “right & wrong” – that came into play when the attempt to sell off the vintage station for a fraction of its value to an “insider” of the former club leadership (who’s leadership often strayed from the fiduciary responsibilities of a “Representational” leadership, to a third form of leadership by a controlling clique called an “Oligarchy” (hit Wiki for an explanation) or virtual “Monarchy”). Fortunately that affront was not very subtle and the membership present refused the attempt to shortchange the club for personal gains by members of the oligarchy.
Holding the responsibility to guide the club to what is moral, legal and self-allowed by constitution should be a relatively easy task. We all have strong personal moral compasses, the words of outside law are clear & easily discoverable, and as flawed as it may be the existing Club Constitution is understandable & obviously has been useful to get us through our first 60 years.
It is when we hit the wall of dealing with members who expect a “super member status,” who would willingly return to running the club from behind the scenes from their small clique, and who basically tell us that they don’t care what the constitution says as they want the club to “do it their way or else.”
The bullying, threats of taking the club hostage (do it our way or we will tear down the club) and threats of quitting (one has to hope if they are that unhappy and so unwilling to be a team player, how do you tell them to “not let the door hit you on the way out?”) are not signs of proper struggle, but the vestiges of a club cleansing itself of people looking to the club for personal advantage & fulfillment of control needs, not in keeping as a Club with “Representational” leadership. They are a mob proposing to return to an “insider’s mob rule” that is neither moral nor legal, and certainly not in keeping with our self-control as expressed in club documents.
We have been elected to shoulder a simple responsibility – to do the best job we can guiding the club in keeping with the club’s representational structure, morality, legality and constitutional vitality.
It is not an election to an amateur-community-wide spot, but very specifically an election to be responsible to the Club first.